// Authorized offensive security

Test what matters.
Fix what fails.

Outcome-led offensive security engagements built around realistic attack paths, controlled execution, and practical remediation. Every assessment is scoped and authorized before testing begins.

Delivered by

Krzysztof Greś

Red Team Specialist & Malware Developer · 5+ years of enterprise offensive security at KPMG Poland and Netia S.A.

  • CRTL
  • CRTO
  • CPTS
  • CRTP
  • AZRTS
  • AD-RTS
  • CRTA

01 Services

Pick the question you need answered

Each engagement is built around one clear security question. Start with the question — the service follows.

  1. SV-01 · Full-scope assessment Red Team Operations “Could a determined attacker reach our crown jewels — and would we notice?” Realistic, objective-led operations that test whether people, processes, and controls can prevent, detect, and contain a determined attacker. External and internal attack pathsIdentity, endpoint, and cloud objectivesDetection and response validation Details
  2. SV-02 · Human and access risk Insider Threat Assessment “What could someone with trusted access do — and would we catch it?” A controlled review of how trusted access, excessive privilege, and process gaps could enable data theft, fraud, sabotage, or unauthorized disclosure. Privilege and trust-path analysisData access and exfiltration controlsJoiner, mover, and leaver scenarios Details
  3. SV-03 · Social engineering Phishing & Smishing Simulations “Do our people report suspicious messages, and does anyone act on it?” Consent-based email and mobile-message campaigns that measure reporting behavior and defensive response without shaming participants. Phishing, spear-phishing, and smishingSafe landing pages and campaign telemetryHelp-desk and escalation-path testing Details
  4. SV-04 · Threat-informed testing Adversary Emulation “Which techniques used against our sector would we actually detect?” Emulation of relevant threat-actor tactics and techniques, mapped to your environment and crown-jewel assets. Threat-profile developmentMITRE ATT&CK-aligned scenariosAssumed-breach exercises Details

02 Method

One disciplined process, every engagement

The techniques change with the service. The way the work is controlled does not.

  1. 01

    Scope and authorize

    Objectives, boundaries, contacts, and stop conditions agreed in writing.

  2. 02

    Plan the scenario

    A realistic, reviewed plan built around your environment and threats.

  3. 03

    Execute with control

    Agreed windows, continuous safety checks, every action logged.

  4. 04

    Measure the response

    What was prevented, detected, investigated, and contained.

  5. 05

    Report and debrief

    Evidence-backed findings and a roadmap your team can act on.

// Primary deliverable

A report built to be acted on

Every engagement ends with a detailed written report — readable by leadership, precise enough for engineers — followed by a technical readout and an optional executive debrief.

  • Executive summary for leadership
  • Attack narrative and timeline
  • Evidence-backed, risk-ranked findings
  • Detection and response observations
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap
View a sample report

03 Rules of engagement

Safe by design, not by luck

Every service is delivered only under these conditions — no exceptions.

  • Written authorization

    No testing starts without documented approval and an agreed scope.

  • Stop conditions

    Clear criteria to pause or halt at any stage, with named emergency contacts.

  • Data minimization

    Only the data the objective requires, handled and retained as agreed.

  • Evidence, not opinion

    Every finding is traceable to timestamped evidence you can verify.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search projects and pages.